We were included in a nice article on EMR consulting and it's impact on adoption.
Waldren says it often becomes a quandary for physicians because they don’t have the financial resources or desire to pay for expert advice, but they are reluctant to start the process of EMR adoption due to fears that the wrong decisions will be made. “You need to show value, and you need to build trust. Those are the two things consultants have to answer for,” Waldren emphasizes. “I do see some uptake [with EMR consultants], but I also see that they have a difficult marketing challenge ahead of them [with physicians].”
That pretty much encapsulates both the article and our feelings on the subject. But do click through so you can read my quotes!
More & more people know that blog are good for every one where we get lots of information any topics !!!
Posted by: Health Related Articles | Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 01:08 PM
That is a very interesting topic. Actually, Gartner analysts predict that, by 2009, healthcare investments in IT will increase by more than 50 percent, which could enable clinicians to reduce the level of preventable deaths by 50 percent by 2013. Of course, nowadays most healthcare organizations have already invested in IT outsourcing, for anything from Telco and Wireless, to Application Data Development (i.e. LIMS, SOA), or even Business Process Management.
We’ve put together a detailed white paper on these subjects: http://www.outsourcing-factory.com/en/stay-informed/white-papers/outsourcing-healthcare.html . What is your experience with IT outsourcing in healthcare? Are these figures close to your personal experience or do you think there are certain issues we’ve missed covering? I strongly appreciate your professional opinions.
Posted by: Gerard Szatvanyi | Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Is Calyx still opertional? I check the blog every so often, but there's been no action in 8 months...
Posted by: Sanjay Gupta | Thursday, January 24, 2008 at 07:54 AM
i think this is a good case where legislation acts as a catalyst to encourage the non-adopters to do the right thing. That's what CMS/jcaho is all about: if you want the government's money (medicare/medicaid) then you'll turn the a bunch of stats (which are very difficult to have without an EMR.)
Posted by: healthtech | Tuesday, July 17, 2007 at 05:56 PM
i think the value proposition is rather straight forward: you can't improve what you can't measure, and medical IT (that is, an EMR) allows you to measure.
Posted by: R Saunders | Wednesday, June 27, 2007 at 08:28 PM