This NYT article is getting a lot of looks recently. The GAO is chiding the Bush Administration for pushing for EHR and interoperability without a firm and realistic security plan in place:
The Bush administration has no clear strategy to protect the privacy of patients as it promotes the use of electronic medical records throughout the nation’s health care system, federal investigators say in a new report.
This topic is in the news more and more these days and is clearly on the minds of many. One interesting point I'd like to see clarified:
Several members of Congress have drafted legislation to clarify consumers’ control over such data. One proposal, by Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas and Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, both Republicans, would establish health data banks in which people could store electronic copies of their medical records. Under the bill, a consumer would “maintain ownership over the entire health record” and could control access to it.
By contrast, under existing federal rules, hospitals and other health care providers generally do not have to obtain a patient’s consent to use or disclose information for “treatment, payment or health care operations.”
There's no mention of the logistics of the Brownback-Ryan proposal. One wonders if they have any idea how that would work, what strictures it would impose on the healthcare industry, whether it's at all feasible, etc. . . . For instance, if the "consumer" had control of what was in the "bank" there would still be data at the doctor's office. Would the bill address the individual locations and how they protect patient data? Would it be realistic to expect that the patient-controlled record could be used as an accurate, reliable record for doctors to work with? We've already seen protestations against PHR that allow patients to "edit" their records.
Is this even something that Congress can be trusted to deal with? Should the market be allowed to work out these issues? Is it too early to answer any of these questions??? Any ideas?
i think the best answer to the loop hospitals.
Posted by: Emr companies list | Monday, November 14, 2011 at 06:43 PM
"Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too
have to help. Very good.
"
Posted by: soccer jerseys | Friday, October 14, 2011 at 10:53 PM
I think its a great work done.
Posted by: Doctors online | Sunday, October 02, 2011 at 07:47 PM
I think its a big threat for the data security.
Posted by: Doctors online | Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 09:52 AM
Golf is a precision club and ball sport, in which competing players (or golfers) use many types of clubs to hit balls into a series of holes on a golf
Posted by: Mizuno MP-59 Irons | Thursday, September 15, 2011 at 10:31 PM
Look at this ein paar Leute jung und buchstabieren können,
Posted by: Scarpe mbt | Friday, July 08, 2011 at 05:44 AM
Fuß ist sehr wichtig für Sie, mbt schuhe günstig Bucause als Mensch, müssen Sie jeden Tag zu gehen. Eine komfortable Schuh kann reduzieren Sie Gefühl der müde mbt schuhe günstig, dies ist, warum viele Frauen heutzutage seltene tragen High-Heel Shoes außerhalb Karriere christian louboutin schuhe.
Posted by: mbt schuhe günstig | Wednesday, July 06, 2011 at 05:42 AM
good thank like your "explosive" analogy, I use it in my business as well. Thanks for the great content.
Posted by: office 2010 | Wednesday, May 04, 2011 at 09:41 PM
Louboutin shoes are effortlessly recognizable from a distance as well, since the red leather sole could be the attraction that catches each eye.
Posted by: jj boots | Friday, January 07, 2011 at 04:12 AM
Louboutin shoes are effortlessly recognizable from a distance as well, since the red leather sole could be the attraction that catches each eye.
Posted by: jj boots | Friday, January 07, 2011 at 04:02 AM
A friendship founded on bussiness is better than business founded on friendship. Do you understand?
Posted by: lacoste shoes | Thursday, July 22, 2010 at 08:43 PM