We've entered into a good-spirited debate with EMR and HIPAA this week about the nature of the "Best EMR" and what features set the best apart from the rest. This originally came about after a favorable post regarding our blog and the information we're putting out there. In that post, the question was posed as to why we chose to align with Misys when so many folks out there seem disenchanted with them. Our response, in brief, was that Misys is dedicated to development and has recently improved upon its previous iterations of EMR with the release of EMR 8.0.
In addition to implementing Continuity of Care Record (CCR) funcitionality in 8.0, Misys has been recognized with the following honors in the past 12 months:
Misys EMR 8.0
- CCHIT Certified Ambulatory EHR (One of 18 charter certifications)
- Top 20: 2005 Year-End Best in KLAS - #6 Ambulatory EMR
- 2006 AC Group Five-Star Rating: EMR & Multi-Specialty EHR
- DOQ-IT Certified
Misys Vision
- 2006 AC Group Five-Star Rating: Fully-integrated PMS
- Top 20: 2006 Mid-Year Best in KLAS - #2 PMS - 100+ Physicians
Misys Tiger
- 2006 AC Group Five-Star Rating: Fully-integrated PMS
Top 20: 2006 Mid-Year Best in KLAS - #6 PMS - 25+ Physicians
And while we don't believe that honors and accolades alone ensure quality, we do take exception with the notion that it's all marketing. The best marketing in the world isn't going to help earn the above honors if the product doesn't do what it's supposed to do.
In the course of the debate, it was pointed out that we hadn't really addressed the question of what features put Misys "ahead of the pack." True. And we won't bother trying. Here's why.
The goal of certifications like CCHIT and organizations like KLAS and AC Group is to provide an outline of the functionality and features of each product to help physicians compare it with its peers. Moreover, the function of CCHIT cerification is widely accepted as winnowing the field from the 400+ applications on the market to a more manageable number that share certain features in common. Good. Once we've established that EMR A, B, & C do in fact have an e-prescribing function (necessary for CCHIT certification) then we can discuss the far more important questions of how that function works, how it fits into your workflow, whether it's simple, secure, and reliable, and any number of other very personal considerations that each physician should ponder before deciding on any EMR.
We used the analogy of your favorite brand of jeans. The point being, once we establish that the parts are all the same you're left with a question of comfort, of subjective like or dislike. And as long as humans practice medicine, there will always be questions of personal feel, of subjective like or dislike (EMR and HIPAA used the equally good analogy of "best" movie). To answer those questions you don't need marketing slicks with bullet-pointed lists of features, you need to get your hands on the application and see what it can do. You need a technology partner that spends time learning about your practice's unique needs. You need a solutions provider that asks the right questions to help you get the most out of your technology investment. In short, you need to feel comfortable knowing that the technology you implement in your practice is a tool that helps you to be a better, more responsive, more efficient physician. And frankly, they don't code that into the software; you get that from working with folks that have passion, integrity, and know-how and who think being the best means helping you to be your best. I know some folks like that. . . I work with them everyday.
So if you want to see the feature set, please do go to the website. If you want to get your hands on it, see what it can do, and find out if you feel comfortable with Misys and Calyx, let us know. We'd be happy to find out together if Misys is right for you.